EPCM

AI that removesdocument busywork.

Your senior engineers spend a significant share of their week compiling, cross-referencing, and formatting—not engineering. We build automations that give that time back.

Typical Outcomes

Reclaim hours each week currently spent on document synthesis

Audit-ready compliance trails without manual cross-referencing

Structured first-drafts that seniors review rather than build from scratch

What We Do

AI that handles the synthesis.
So your engineers handle the judgment.

We build automations for the repetitive document work that eats engineering hours—compiling, cross-referencing, formatting—so your team can focus on the work that requires their expertise.

What this can include

01

Document-heavy workflow automation (reports, proposals, estimates)

02

Standards and regulatory compliance cross-referencing

03

Structured data extraction from filings and project records

04

Human-in-the-loop approval at every critical step

Automation Opportunities

Six workflows worth automating

Each one targets the synthesis and formatting work that eats engineering hours without requiring engineering judgment.

Weekly Project Report Generator

The problem

PMs spend 2–4 hours every Friday compiling progress reports from scattered meeting notes, emails, schedule exports, and safety logs.

What we build

Feed it raw input files, get a formatted client-ready Word report with executive summary, schedule status, HSE stats, and action items.

Construction professionals spend 35% of their week on non-productive tasks including status reporting. PMs review and edit instead of compiling from scratch.

~4 hrs/week

Regulatory Compliance Checker

The problem

The AER publishes dozens of directives governing facility design, operations, and abandonment. Engineers must cross-reference designs against applicable directives for every new project, reading through regulatory text manually.

What we build

Ingests your project scope and checks it against applicable directives, flagging compliance gaps with specific section references.

Reduces the risk of missed regulatory requirements. Creates an auditable compliance trail that junior engineers can run, with seniors reviewing flagged items only.

Audit-ready

Capital Project Intelligence

The problem

BD teams rely on personal networks and word of mouth to discover upcoming facility construction and expansion projects.

What we build

Analyzes public securities filings to extract capex guidance, project announcements, and timelines — structured into a BD brief.

Systematic pipeline tracking vs. ad-hoc awareness. Catches opportunities your BD team would miss.

Systematic BD

RFP Response Drafter

The problem

60–70% of every proposal is boilerplate (qualifications, safety record, methodology) lightly customized for each bid.

What we build

Extracts RFP requirements, maps them to your pre-written content library, and produces a structured first-draft response in Word.

Cuts boilerplate assembly by 70%. Bid on more work or invest time where it wins jobs.

70% faster

Specification Cross-Reference Tool

The problem

API alone publishes 800+ standards for oil and gas. A single facility’s engineering specs can reference dozens of codes across CSA, API, ASME, and NACE. When standards update, engineers spend nearly half their time searching for and verifying currency.

What we build

Extracts all standards references from your specs, checks against current editions, and flags outdated or withdrawn standards.

Eliminates manual cross-referencing. Catches outdated or withdrawn standards before they cause procurement or compliance issues.

800+ standards

ROM Cost Estimate Generator

The problem

Senior engineers build rough-order-of-magnitude cost estimates from scratch for every early-stage project, pulling together equipment pricing, labour rates, and construction costs.

What we build

Takes a project scope description and generates a structured ROM estimate in Excel with WBS breakdown, equipment costs, labour, indirects, and contingency.

Produces a structured first draft that senior engineers review and adjust rather than build from scratch. Consistent methodology across estimates.

Consistent ROM

Want to discuss which of these fits your firm?

Book a call
Common Engagement Shapes

Pick a starting point that fits your urgency and appetite.

Automation Pilot Sprint

We build one automation end-to-end (e.g. the weekly report generator) with your team reviewing output at every stage.

Best for: firms that want to see results before committing to a broader rollout.

Ongoing Automation Support

Stabilize existing automations, expand to the next workflow, and keep output quality on track as your needs evolve.

Best for: firms that want continuity and compounding efficiency gains.

Who This Is For

This works best for EPCM firms that have:

Mid-market EPCM firms with high volumes of structured documents (reports, estimates, proposals)
A project controls or engineering manager who owns document workflows
Interest in freeing senior engineers from synthesis work to focus on engineering judgment
FAQ

Common Questions

See what AI can remove from your workflow.

Book a call and we'll identify the first workflow worth automating for your firm.